[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]
Subject: Re: [dita] Groups - DITA TC Minutes: March 08, 2011 (TCMinutes_03-08-2011.txt) uploaded
Hi all -- I updated the minutes from our TC meeting last week in response to Paul's comments. I have added below the same updates that I made to the modified meeting minutes document. Stan On 3/8/2011 3:07 PM, Grosso, Paul wrote: 9B2DE9094C827E44988F5ADAA6A2C5DA024657F6@HQ-MAIL9.ptcnet.ptc.com" type="cite">-----Original Message----- From: stan@modularwriting.com [mailto:stan@modularwriting.com] Sent: Tuesday, 2011 March 08 13:13 To: dita@lists.oasis-open.org Subject: [dita] Groups - DITA TC Minutes: March 08, 2011 (TCMinutes_03- 08-2011.txt) uploaded The document named DITA TC Minutes: March 08, 2011 (TCMinutes_03-08-2011.txt) has been submitted by Dr. Stanley Doherty to the OASIS Darwin Information Typing Architecture (DITA) TC document repository. Document Description: View Document Details: http://www.oasis-open.org/committees/document.php?document_id=41388 Download Document: http://www.oasis-open.org/committees/download.php/41388/TCMinutes_03- 08-2011.txtSome comments.- Processing support: Su-Laine asked John for an update on the state of processing support for the L&T specializations. John reported that the current L&T specializations relied heavily on default processing tools and flows. That said, the L&T SC has posted a set of sample topics and set of XHTML processing extensions for review.XHTML processing extensions or expectations? >>> SDoherty update [03/14/2011]: John described the deliverable as processing "extensions" in my notes. 9B2DE9094C827E44988F5ADAA6A2C5DA024657F6@HQ-MAIL9.ptcnet.ptc.com" type="cite">>>> SDoherty update [03/14/2011]: John did not reference a specificHas posted where? Need a URI if you want it reviewed. URL in his verbal report. The public web site for the L&T samples and documentation is at: - http://www.oasis-open.org/committees/tc_home.php?wg_abbrev=dita-learningspec No formal review is referenced in that site. 9B2DE9094C827E44988F5ADAA6A2C5DA024657F6@HQ-MAIL9.ptcnet.ptc.com" type="cite">>>> SDoherty update [03/14/2011]: In his verbal report, John didReviewed for what? Is it to become a TC deliverable? not mention a formal review cycle for the posted materials or a formal plan to treat them as TC deliverables. 9B2DE9094C827E44988F5ADAA6A2C5DA024657F6@HQ-MAIL9.ptcnet.ptc.com" type="cite">>>> SDoherty update [03/14/2011]: The URL posted in the TC001. ITEM: FAQ item about "Question about the order in which keys are resolved" - Kris noted to TC members that this FAQ was now ready for review and that members should review it this week.Please include URIs in minutes, especially for things that are supposed to be reviewed. Is "Question about the order in which keys are resolved" the same as Q. Given multiple key definitions, how does a processor determine which key definition is effective? at: http://wiki.oasis-open.org/dita/FAQ-items#Q.Givenmultiplekeydefinitions.2Chowdoesaprocessordeterminewhichkeydefinitioniseffective.3F >>> SDoherty update [03/14/2011]: The URL posted in the TC wiki Frontpage for review of this issue was: - http://wiki.oasis-open.org/dita/FAQ-items#Q.Givenmultiplekeydefinitions.2Chowdoesaprocessordeterminewhichkeydefinitioniseffective.3F002. ITEM: FAQ item about "Key resolution for complex <topicmeta> content" - Su-Laine noted that this FAQ draft was ready for review as well.I assume that is at http://www.oasis-open.org/apps/org/workgroup/dita/email/archives/201103/msg00008.html wiki Frontpage for review of this issue was: - http://www.oasis-open.org/apps/org/workgroup/dita/email/archives/201103/msg00008.html 9B2DE9094C827E44988F5ADAA6A2C5DA024657F6@HQ-MAIL9.ptcnet.ptc.com" type="cite">>>> SDoherty update [03/14/2011]: As of the TC meeting, no write-up004. ITEM: General implications of multiple uses of the same topic with different keys - Robert suggested that the TC not review this in this meeting without Michael on the call. - AI/Robert: Touch base with Michael this coming week to determine how/whether Michael needs assistance in writing up a proposed resolution or whether Robert should assume ownership of that write-up.And what is the URI of the write up we plan to review when Michael is on the call? on this issue was available for review. 9B2DE9094C827E44988F5ADAA6A2C5DA024657F6@HQ-MAIL9.ptcnet.ptc.com" type="cite">>>> SDoherty update [03/14/2011]: The wiki page concerning this topic that007. ITEM: DITA 1.3 process - Robert summarized for the TC the DITA 1.3 process proposal that the TC discussed and approved last summer.at http://wiki.oasis-open.org/dita/DITA_1.3_Proposal_Process referenced on the TC Frontpage was: - http://wiki.oasis-open.org/dita/DITA_1.3_Proposal_Process 9B2DE9094C827E44988F5ADAA6A2C5DA024657F6@HQ-MAIL9.ptcnet.ptc.com" type="cite">>>> SDoherty update [03/14/2011]: The template document referenced on- Hearing no new concerns of objections from TC members, Don declared that the approval last summer remained in effect and that the process proposal as described would be the official process that the TC would follow for DITA 1.3. - Kris and Robert informed the TC that a draft of the proposal template was available for review.at: http://www.oasis-open.org/apps/org/workgroup/dita/download.php/41383/1-3template.dita the TC Frontpage was: - http://www.oasis-open.org/apps/org/workgroup/dita/download.php/41383/1-3template.dita 9B2DE9094C827E44988F5ADAA6A2C5DA024657F6@HQ-MAIL9.ptcnet.ptc.com" type="cite">- AI/TC-members: Review the proposed proposal template this week and be prepared to discuss and (hopefully) approve it next meeting (03/15). |
[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]