RE: Questions about last week's minutes

["Grosso, Paul" <pgrosso@ptc.com>]

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Kristen Eberlein [mailto:keberlein@sdl.com]
> Sent: Tuesday, 2011 March 15 9:08
> To: Grosso, Paul; dita@lists.oasis-open.org
> Subject: Questions about last week's minutes
> 
> Hi, Paul.
> 
> I know that Stan answered some of your questions in e-mails and his
> explanations of the modified minutes. Let me see if I can answer some
> of your
> unanswered questions.
> 
> Report from Learning and Training SC:
> -------------------------------------
> 
> > - Processing support: Su-Laine asked John for an update on the
> >       state of processing support for the L&T specializations. John
> >       reported that the current L&T specializations relied heavily
> >       on default processing tools and flows. That said, the L&T
> >       SC has posted a set of sample topics and set of XHTML
> >       processing extensions for review.
> 
> 
> <Paul> XHTML processing extensions or expectations? Has posted where?
> Need a
> URI if you want it reviewed. Reviewed for what?  Is it to become a TC
> deliverable? </Paul>

Stan said he heard "extensions".

> 
> <Kris> I think the phrase "for review" should simply removed. </Kris>


I'm still intrigued (and perhaps a bit concerned) about "XHTML
processing extensions", so I'd like to learn more about them,
so I'd still like a URL.  If an "SC has posted" something, then
there should be a URL so that interested TC members can read
what the SC has posted. 

paul