RE: [dita] Please read yesterday's minutes

["Grosso, Paul" <pgrosso@ptc.com>]

I had read them when they came out, and nothing glared at me.

paul

> -----Original Message-----
> From: dita@lists.oasis-open.org [mailto:dita@lists.oasis-open.org] On
> Behalf Of Tom Magliery
> Sent: Wednesday, 2011 October 05 12:10
> To: dita@lists.oasis-open.org
> Subject: [dita] Please read yesterday's minutes
> 
> Hi all,
> 
> I'm on holiday starting tomorrow and through next week, so I won't
have
> any opportunity after today to make corrections to yesterday's
minutes.
> If a person or two would have a quick look today just to make sure
> there
> are no glaring problems or omissions, I'll be grateful. They're
> uploaded
> to the Documents section of the website, and also copied below.
> 
> The only immediate action item is for Don; it looks like Robert made
> all
> necessary updates to the 1.3 Proposals list on the fly, or at least
> very
> quickly after the meeting.
> 
> mag
> 
>
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
> -
> ------
> Minutes of the OASIS DITA TC
> Tuesday 4 Oct 2011
> Recorded by Tom Magliery
> 
> Quorum present, meeting opened by Don Day
> Regrets: Kris Eberlein, Thilo Buchholz
> 
> Previous meeting's minutes:
> Moved to approve by Don Day; seconded by Stan Doherty; minutes
approved
> by
> acclamation.
> 
> Subcommittee report:
> --------------------
> DITA Adoption subcommittee, JoAnn Hackos
> No recent meetings, but have been working outside meetings, working on
> XLIFF
> feature article. With Don's help resolved issue of catalogs, awaiting
> resulting changes to be made to XLIFF article. Hoping for vote on
XLIFF
> article next meeting. Several parties have been expressing interest in
> creating new feature articles.
> 
> ACTION ITEM
> Don to remind Bob Beims to attend next week's meeting and give
> subcommittee
> report.
> 
> New Business
> ------------
> Item from Chris Nitchie:
> http://lists.oasis-open.org/archives/dita/201109/msg00049.html
> Requesting clarification on processing rules for deriving affected
text
> for
> empty keyrefs. Chris summarized the issue based on an earlier email
> from
> February 2011. The language from this email needs to be rolled into
the
> specification. This is on the 1.3 Proposals list as #13079.
> Robert Anderson moved to move this to "initially accepted"; seconded
by
> Chris;
> approved by acclamation.
> 
> DITA 1.3 Proposals triage (continued)
> -------------------------------------
> 13063 - Research still pending, no action today.
> 
> 13064 - Moved to "bug fix" by acclamation.
> 
> 13065 - Moved to "bug fix" by acclamation. Drop the part about
> mentioning the
> Unicode char for slash in an appendix.
> 
> 13066 - Moved to "bug fix" (moved by Robert, seconded by Eliot Kimber,
> approved by acclamation). Fix will be to make the DITA schemas
> consistent with
> the prose description that is already in the text, i.e. to allow
> <msgph>
> and
> <msgnum> in <msgblock". Drop the part about allowing <ph>.
> 
> 13068 - Su-Laine Yeo to look for the "bad" language in the spec and
> we'll
> revisit this item later.
> 
> 13069 - Today's spec wording is precise, but might need some
> clarification.
> Eliot volunteered to take ownership, produce Appendix for
> specification,
> and
> make an earlier draft available for consideration by the Adoption
> committee as
>  an informational paper. Don Day moved to accept all this and move the
> item to
>  "initially accepted"; seconded by Eliot; approved by acclamation.
> 
> 13070 - Item will be withdrawn for 1.3.
> 
> Meeting adjourned at 9:00am PDT
> 
> --
> Tom Magliery
> XML Technology Specialist
> JustSystems Canada, Inc.
> Direct: 778-327-6550
> 
> 
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dita-unsubscribe@lists.oasis-open.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: dita-help@lists.oasis-open.org