RE: [dita] Issue 13072

["Nitchie, Chris" <cnitchie@ptc.com>]

Eliot,

It looks like I was the only one who replied last time, and my
preference was different from yours. That said, my argument is simply
that in 1.2 the behavior is underspecified, and your proposal is to
specify it in 1.3, and as such, I don't feel particularly strongly one
way or another, so if that's the situation I have no objection.

I do have one suggestion, though. If we're going to say that an xref
with a keyref to a key definition bound to a map behaves in a certain
way, then I'd ask that we explicitly specify the same behavior for <xref
format="ditamap"> without a keyref.

Chris

-----Original Message-----
From: dita@lists.oasis-open.org [mailto:dita@lists.oasis-open.org] On
Behalf Of Eliot Kimber
Sent: Tuesday, October 11, 2011 11:59 AM
To: dita
Subject: [dita] Issue 13072

The original discussion thread starts here:

http://www.oasis-open.org/apps/org/workgroup/dita/email/archives/201102/
msg0
0094.html

I think we had arrived at consensus, but probably need to reconfirm
since
some time has passed.

Cheers,

E.

-- 
Eliot Kimber
Senior Solutions Architect
"Bringing Strategy, Content, and Technology Together"
Main: 512.554.9368
www.reallysi.com
www.rsuitecms.com


---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dita-unsubscribe@lists.oasis-open.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dita-help@lists.oasis-open.org