Re: [dita] DITA 1.3 documentation -- shall we remove the Contains and "Contains by" tables

[Scott Hudson <scott.hudson@schneider-electric.com>]

Title: Re: [dita] DITA 1.3 documentation -- shall we remove the Contains and "Contains by" tables

I think it’s useful. Let’s fix the false hits problem so it works. I use this feature all the time.

Thanks and best regards,

--Scott

Scott Hudson |  Pelco by Schneider Electric | United States | Standards Lead
Phone: +1-970-282-1952  | Mobile: +1-720-663-7268 | Support: +1-800-289-9100
Email: scott.hudson@schneider-electric.com | Site: pdn.pelco.com | Address: 3800 Automation Way, Suite 300 Ft. Collins, CO 80525-3449 - USA




On 9/11/12 2:49 PM, "Kristen James Eberlein" <kris@eberleinconsulting.com> wrote:

>    As we start working on DITA 1.3 documentation, we need to consider whether to include the Contains and "Contains by" tables in the Language Reference topics.
>  
>  Pro = Useful information
>  Con = Makes it impossible to search the spec and find information about a specific element, since there are so many false hits. For example, if you search the PDF version for indexterm, you get over 130 false hits before you land on the actual topic.
>  
>  Best, 
>  Kris 
>  
>  Kristen James Eberlein 
>  Principal consultant, Eberlein Consulting 
>  Co-chair, OASIS DITA Technical Committee 
>  Charter member, OASIS DITA Adoption Committee 
>  www.eberleinconsulting.com <http://www.eberleinconsulting.com>  
>  +1 919 682-2290; kriseberlein (skype)  
> ______________________________________________________________________
> This email has been scanned by the Symantec Email Security.cloud service.
> ______________________________________________________________________