What is your suggestion for fixing the
false hits?
Best,
Kris
Kristen James Eberlein
Principal consultant, Eberlein Consulting
Co-chair, OASIS DITA Technical Committee
Charter member, OASIS DITA Adoption Committee
www.eberleinconsulting.com
+1 919 682-2290; kriseberlein (skype)
On 9/11/2012 4:56 PM, Scott Hudson wrote:
I think it’s useful. Let’s fix the
false hits problem so it works. I use this feature all the
time.
Thanks and best regards,
--Scott
Scott Hudson |
Pelco by Schneider Electric
| United States | Standards Lead
Phone: +1-970-282-1952 | Mobile:
+1-720-663-7268 | Support:
+1-800-289-9100
Email: scott.hudson@schneider-electric.com | Site: pdn.pelco.com | Address: 3800
Automation Way, Suite 300 Ft. Collins, CO 80525-3449 - USA
On 9/11/12 2:49 PM, "Kristen James Eberlein" <kris@eberleinconsulting.com>
wrote:
As we start working on DITA 1.3 documentation, we
need to consider whether to include the Contains and
"Contains by" tables in the Language Reference topics.
Pro = Useful information
Con = Makes it impossible to search the spec and find
information about a specific element, since there are so
many false hits. For example, if you search the PDF version
for indexterm, you get over 130 false hits before you land
on the actual topic.
Best,
Kris
Kristen James Eberlein
Principal consultant, Eberlein Consulting
Co-chair, OASIS DITA Technical Committee
Charter member, OASIS DITA Adoption Committee
www.eberleinconsulting.com <http://www.eberleinconsulting.com>
+1 919 682-2290; kriseberlein (skype)
______________________________________________________________________
This email has been scanned by the Symantec Email
Security.cloud service.
______________________________________________________________________
|