dita message
[Date Prev]
| [Thread Prev]
| [Thread Next]
| [Date Next]
--
[Date Index]
| [Thread Index]
| [List Home]
Subject: Re: [dita] DITA 1.3 documentation -- shall we remove the Contains and "Contains by" tables
- From: Michael Priestley <mpriestl@ca.ibm.com>
- To: Kristen James Eberlein <kris@eberleinconsulting.com>
- Date: Tue, 11 Sep 2012 17:21:12 -0400
In an ideal world, put them in a separate
document (or separate documents - one per document type) and link to them.
Michael Priestley, Senior Technical Staff Member (STSM)
Total Information Experience (TIE) Technology Strategist
mpriestl@ca.ibm.com
http://dita.xml.org/blog/25
From:
Kristen James Eberlein
<kris@eberleinconsulting.com>
To:
DITA TC <dita@lists.oasis-open.org>,
Date:
09/11/2012 04:49 PM
Subject:
[dita] DITA
1.3 documentation -- shall we remove the Contains and "Contains by"
tables
Sent by:
<dita@lists.oasis-open.org>
As we start working on DITA 1.3 documentation,
we need to consider whether to include the Contains and "Contains
by" tables in the Language Reference topics.
Pro = Useful information
Con = Makes it impossible to search the spec and find information about
a specific element, since there are so many false hits. For example, if
you search the PDF version for indexterm, you get over 130 false hits before
you land on the actual topic.
Best,
Kris
Kristen James Eberlein
Principal consultant, Eberlein Consulting
Co-chair, OASIS DITA Technical Committee
Charter member, OASIS DITA Adoption Committee
www.eberleinconsulting.com
+1 919 682-2290; kriseberlein (skype)
[Date Prev]
| [Thread Prev]
| [Thread Next]
| [Date Next]
--
[Date Index]
| [Thread Index]
| [List Home]