dita message
[Date Prev]
| [Thread Prev]
| [Thread Next]
| [Date Next]
--
[Date Index]
| [Thread Index]
| [List Home]
Subject: review of Proposal #13078
- From: Nancy <nancylph@gmail.com>
- To: dita <dita@lists.oasis-open.org>
- Date: Sun, 6 Jan 2013 14:26:38 -0800
Hi,
After looking at 13078, I have the following comments
table[@orient] - I also wonder if 'port' and 'land' are the right names for these attribute values. I noticed David suggested giving the full words portrait/landscape, but there's also the fact that if a document is itself in landscape mode, either of those variants would be confusing. Maybe 'standard' or 'normal' and 'rotate'? That would connect this with the entry/@rotate attribute as well.
Other than that, I like David's suggestion of adding the text from the original proposal back into the spec language.
entry[@rotate] - I agree with David; rather than '1' and '0', I'd prefer to use 'yes' and 'no'. Most users are neither mathematicians nor engineers.
Thanks, Chris, for getting the implementation out.
Regards,
Nancy
--
_____________
Nancy Harrison
Infobridge Solutions
nharrison@infobridge-solutions.com
[Date Prev]
| [Thread Prev]
| [Thread Next]
| [Date Next]
--
[Date Index]
| [Thread Index]
| [List Home]