[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]
Subject: Proposal 13056: Extension to syntax for built-in selection attributes
I like this proposal very much. The one thing that comes to mind is adding, or at least mentioning as a possibility, the use of subjectScheme maps to declare and validate user-defined groups. That is, I'd like the option, as a DITA system administrator, the option to formally define what groups authors should be allowed to use by using subjectScheme maps, which I would likely already be using to define value uses for use in conditional attributes. I'm not sure what would be required--I haven't thought this idea through and I wouldn't want something like this to overburden the proposal, but it seems like a natural extension of the current use of subjectSchemes for defining attribute value lists. Cheers, E. -- Eliot Kimber Senior Solutions Architect, RSI Content Solutions "Bringing Strategy, Content, and Technology Together" Main: 512.554.9368 www.rsicms.com www.rsuitecms.com Book: DITA For Practitioners, from XML Press, http://xmlpress.net/publications/dita/practitioners-1/
[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]