Re: [dita] Status of 13089: Is Better Than I Represented It

[Eliot Kimber <ekimber@rsicms.com>]

I am having a bad day: the reference topics *are* in the proposal doc, as
well as available as separate files. So I think the minimum V3 requirements
are met.

My apologies to Mark and Doug for misrepresenting the state of their
proposal. 

Cheers,

E.

On 6/4/13 1:47 PM, "Eliot Kimber" <ekimber@rsicms.com> wrote:

> It turns out I was inadvertently working from an old version of the 13089 V3
> spec. The correct version is much more complete and closer to the V3
> requirements. However, the language reference topics are currently provided
> as separate topics, not part of the proposal XML doc. But they are written.
> 
> Cheers,
> 
> E.
> 
> --
> Eliot Kimber
> Senior Solutions Architect, RSI Content Solutions
> "Bringing Strategy, Content, and Technology Together"
> Main: 512.554.9368
> www.rsicms.com
> www.rsuitecms.com
> Book: DITA For Practitioners, from XML Press,
> http://xmlpress.net/publications/dita/practitioners-1/
> 
> 
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe from this mail list, you must leave the OASIS TC that
> generates this mail.  Follow this link to all your TCs in OASIS at:
> https://www.oasis-open.org/apps/org/workgroup/portal/my_workgroups.php
> 

-- 
Eliot Kimber
Senior Solutions Architect, RSI Content Solutions
"Bringing Strategy, Content, and Technology Together"
Main: 512.554.9368
www.rsicms.com
www.rsuitecms.com
Book: DITA For Practitioners, from XML Press,
http://xmlpress.net/publications/dita/practitioners-1/