Re: [dita] Discrepancies between the RNG troubleshooting model and the DTD model in the approved feature

[Eliot Kimber <ekimber@contrext.com>]

I have corrected the RNG, regenerated the DTDs, RNCs, and XSDs and
committed to SVN. I updated the troubleshooting test document to verify
all three forms of step and to verify the rules for <troubleSolution>,
which was incorrect per the 13 Jan version of the troubleshooting proposal.

Cheers,

E.

—————
Eliot Kimber, Owner
Contrext, LLC
http://contrext.com




On 4/22/14, 1:37 PM, "Bob Thomas" <bob.thomas@tagsmiths.com> wrote:

>I found the following discrepancies between the RNG model and DTD model
>that was approved in feature 13097, troubleshooting topic:
>The content model for remedy is missing an optional title element and the
>steps-informal element
>
>The remedy.content group should be defined as follows:
>
>
><define name="remedy.content">
>
>  <optional>
>
>    <optional>
>      <ref name="title"/>
>    </optional>
>    <optional>
>
>      <ref name="responsibleParty"/>
>
>    </optional>
>
>    <choice>
>
>      <ref name="steps"/>
>
>      <ref name="steps-unordered"/>
>
>      <ref name="steps-informal"/>
>
>    </choice>
>
>  </optional>
>
></define>
>
>
>
>
>Missing spectitle attribute on specializations of section
>
>The definitions for cause.attributes, condition.attributes, and
>remedy.attributes are each missing an optional spectitle attribute. In
>each case, the attributes should be defined in RNG as follows:
>
>
><optional>
>
>
>  <attribute name="spectitle"/>
>
>
></optional>
>
>
><ref name="univ-atts"/>
>
>
><optional>
>
>
>  <attribute name="outputclass"/>
>
>
></optional>
>
>
>
>
>
>Approved feature contains a non-valid attribute specification for
>responsibleParty
>
>The DTD model in the approved feature defines the responsibleParty
>attributes as follows:
>
><!ENTITY % responsibleParty.attributes
> "name CDATA #IMPLIED"
>>
>
>
>The DTD model derived from the RNG is as follows:
>
>
><!ENTITY % responsibleParty.attributes
>
>
>
>
>  "%univ-atts;
>
>
>
>   outputclass   CDATA   #IMPLIED"
>
>
>
>>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>In an earlier draft, responsibleParty inherited from the <data> element,
>so the @name attribute worked. Later,  responsibleParty was changed to
>inherit from the <p> element. @name is not available on <p>,
>unfortunately, this went unnoticed. Consequently, the approved model is
>not valid. The current implementation in the RNG is reasonable, and it
>should be used instead of the approved model.
>
>
>Best Regards,
>-- 
>Bob Thomas+1 720 201 8260
>Skype: bob.thomas.colorado
>Instant messaging: Gmail chat (bob.thomas@tagsmiths.com) or Skype
>Time zone: Mountain (GMT-7)
>
>
>
>
>
>