[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]
Subject: RE: [dita] Review #2 comments: DITAVAL elements
As a DITA (and DITA-OT) user, this processor feedback is extremely important to me. In my world, we build maps of topics and maps assembled by different teams using different workflows. Keeping my ditaval file up-to-date with the prop usage is
crucial to avoid creating an incorrect rendition (due to filtering problems). (For the record, I know how subjectScheme could help me proactively manage this issue, but we’ve not been able to implement it in our environment.) If I process my top map with a ditaval file and someone else has included an unknown prop (or misspelled the prop value), then I need to know about it.
As a DITA user, I will insist that any DITA processor provide this feedback, so having something in the spec that calls attention to this usecase seems like a
good thing. Perhaps we can just say “may” instead of “should” as a way of implying the need to tool developers? -seth From: dita@lists.oasis-open.org [mailto:dita@lists.oasis-open.org]
On Behalf Of Kristen James Eberlein Referring another comment to the TC for discussion:
-- --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe from this mail list, you must leave the OASIS TC that generates this mail. Follow this link to all your TCs in OASIS at:
https://www.oasis-open.org/apps/org/workgroup/portal/my_workgroups.php |
[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]