OASIS Mailing List ArchivesView the OASIS mailing list archive below
or browse/search using MarkMail.

 


Help: OASIS Mailing Lists Help | MarkMail Help

dita message

[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]


Subject: Re: [dita] L&T diagrams


Hi Tom,
I think John Hunt ought to take a look at these. I believe he created them originally since they go way back to the original L&T design work. I would also ask Mark Meyer to take a look since we now have a new learning map structure. 

JoAnn


JoAnn T. Hackos, PhD
President
Comtech Services Inc.
710 Kipling Street, Suite 400
Denver, CO 80215
Joann.hackos@comtech-serv.com
303-232-7586

 

Comtech Logo 2005 small


We will be hosting the CIDM Online Conference on July 29, 2015   More information is available: https://forum.infomanagementcenter.com


From: Tom Magliery <tom.magliery@justsystems.com>
Date: Friday, July 24, 2015 at 3:09 PM
To: DITA TC <dita@lists.oasis-open.org>
Subject: [dita] L&T diagrams

I'd like to hear (perhaps off-list) from someone intimately familiar with the content and the two diagrams in this portion of the DITA spec:

 

2.8.3 A learning objects approach to learning and training content

http://docs.oasis-open.org/dita/dita/v1.3/csprd01/part3-all-inclusive/archSpec/learningTraining/lc_spec_Overview_assumptions.html

 

I'm working on prettying up the graphics throughout the spec, and I don't know enough about this content to know how much leeway I might have on these two diagrams. My questions are along the lines of: Are any apparent grammatical inconsistencies actually significant terminology? Can any text change without substantively changing the diagram? Are aspects of the layout (such as the shapes and arrangements of objects) significant to someone in this domain of expertise?

 

Thanks,

mag



[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]