Re: [dita] DITA 2.0 planning: What deprecated elements need to be removed?

[Eliot Kimber <ekimber@contrext.com>]

A related question is should we move less-used domains to separate
specifications? For example, the XNAL domain is probably used by somebody
but I've definitely never used it.

It might be useful to try to establish a precedent of having
special-purpose domains and structural types defined in their own
specifications. That would serve to reduce the size of the base DITA
specification while keeping the vocabulary as OASIS standards. It would
also set a precedent for more modularity in the way that DITA-based
standard vocabularies are defined.

Cheers,

E.
----
Eliot Kimber, Owner
Contrext, LLC
http://contrext.com




On 5/17/16, 9:37 AM, "Kristen James Eberlein" <dita@lists.oasis-open.org
on behalf of kris@eberleinconsulting.com> wrote:

>Also, are there elements like <topicsetref> that do not add value/are
>duplicates and should be removed?
>
>Or little used features or functionality that do not add sufficient
>value and should be considered for removal?
>-- 
>Best,
>Kris
>
>Kristen James Eberlein
>Chair, OASIS DITA Technical Committee
>Principal consultant, Eberlein Consulting
>www.eberleinconsulting.com
>+1 919 682-2290; kriseberlein (skype)
>
>
>---------------------------------------------------------------------
>To unsubscribe from this mail list, you must leave the OASIS TC that
>generates this mail.  Follow this link to all your TCs in OASIS at:
>https://www.oasis-open.org/apps/org/workgroup/portal/my_workgroups.php
>
>