[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]
Subject: RE: [dita] DITA 2.0: suggest removing @xtrf, @xtrc
Agreed to remove them – their use is likely not interoperable (kind of attributes use in many ways). Although there may be people using them but the DITA standard is not currently in the business of processing. I have always had the idea however, that the OT should define “preprocessing” validity using DTDs. If this could be handled as a valid modification to the DITA DTDs that would be great. This would mean that a DITA repository could store and validate OT preprocessed DITA using DITA specializations such as the debug attributes. Jim From: dita@lists.oasis-open.org [mailto:dita@lists.oasis-open.org] On Behalf Of Eliot Kimber I agree with Robert and Chris: remove them. Cheers, E. From: dita <dita@lists.oasis-open.org> on behalf of Chris Nitchie <chris.nitchie@oberontech.com> I agree. Unlike copy-to, I have used these in my implementations, both for debugging and for traceability from output HTML elements to source XML elements. But they’re not to be used by authors, and so probably shouldn’t be there (but as Robert says, they can still be added by processors for whatever purposes). Chris From: <dita@lists.oasis-open.org> on behalf of Robert D Anderson <robander@us.ibm.com> For DITA 2.0, I'd like to suggest removing @xtrf and @xtrc, also known as the "debug attribute group":
|
[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]