Fwd: RE: DITA 2.0: How might we reorganize (reformulate?) the spec for DITA 2.0

[Kristen James Eberlein <kris@eberleinconsulting.com>]

FYI

Best,
Kris

Kristen James Eberlein
Chair, OASIS DITA Technical Committee
Principal consultant, Eberlein Consulting
www.eberleinconsulting.com
+1 919 682-2290; kriseberlein (skype)

-------- Forwarded Message --------

Subject:	RE: DITA 2.0: How might we reorganize (reformulate?) the spec for DITA 2.0
Date:	Wed, 7 Sep 2016 13:50:25 +0000
From:	Leigh White <Leigh.White@ixiasoft.com>
To:	Kristen James Eberlein <kris@eberleinconsulting.com>

This is a micro request, but I'd like to see an alphabetical list/TOC for the attributes, just like what there is now for the elements (Language reference>Element quick reference>All DITA elements, A to Z). Finding a specific attribute description is a little harder than it needs to be, IMO.

Leigh

-----Original Message-----
From: Kristen James Eberlein [mailto:kris@eberleinconsulting.com] 
Sent: Tuesday, September 6, 2016 9:52 AM
To: DITA TC <dita@lists.oasis-open.org>
Subject: DITA 2.0: How might we reorganize (reformulate?) the spec for DITA 2.0

DITA 1.0: Separate architectural spec and language reference

DITA 1.1: " "

DITA 1.2: Aggregated archSpec and LangRef

DITA 1.3: " " and three editions

What do we want to consider for DITA 2.0?


--
Best,
Kris

Kristen James Eberlein
Chair, OASIS DITA Technical Committee
Principal consultant, Eberlein Consulting www.eberleinconsulting.com
+1 919 682-2290; kriseberlein (skype)