This is the response I got from Jang about the Hazard Statement Domain last week.
I suggest we stick a pin in the original proposal and use it as a placeholder under he comes up the full, new proposal he has promised to deliver.
Cheers!
-
Keith Schengili-Roberts
Market Researcher and DITA Evangelist
IXIASOFT
825 Querbes, Suite 200, Montréal, Québec, Canada, H2V 3X1
tel + 1 514
279-4942 / toll free + 1 877 279-4942
From: Jang Graat <info@smartinfodesign.com>
Sent: Wednesday, February 15, 2017 3:22 AM
To: Keith Schengili-Roberts
Subject: Re: Looking at Redesigning Hazard Statement Domain for DITA 2.0
Sent: Wednesday, February 15, 2017 3:22 AM
To: Keith Schengili-Roberts
Subject: Re: Looking at Redesigning Hazard Statement Domain for DITA 2.0
Hi Keith,
I will write an initial proposal, which I can present to the TC on one of the upcoming calls. I do need a little time to make this a good proposal, not the half-hearted one that was concocted for the current hazardstatement element. Safety is a huge deal
in machine industry, so the domain needs to cover all common use cases in a way that meets the requirements of the various safety-related standards. I have good connections to a number of CE safety specialists, whom I can ask for feedback in the second stage,
where the markup is going to be defined.
Ciao from Amsterdam
