Postponed: TC review of DITA 1.3 Errata 02

[Alan Houser <arh@groupwellesley.com>]

Colleagues,

I missed a detail when setting up the DITAweb review of DITA 1.3 Errata 02 ... all "annotatable" elements must have an ID. (We encountered this with the LwDITA Committee Note review). We must either provide element IDs in our source or work with Congility to automatically populate element IDs.

After consulting with Kris, we've decided it's best to postpone this review. We will discuss at tomorrow's TC meeting.

If you did provide comments in DITAweb, I will carry those forward. Apologies, and thanks!

-Alan

-------- Forwarded Message --------

Subject:	[dita] DITA 1.3 Errata 02 on DITAWeb for public review
Date:	Wed, 13 Dec 2017 15:42:23 -0500
From:	Alan Houser <arh@groupwellesley.com>
Reply-To:	arh@groupwellesley.com
Organization:	Group Wellesley, Inc.
To:	dita@lists.oasis-open.org

Colleagues,

The DITA 1.3 Errata 02 is available on DITAWeb for TC review. This is 
our final opportunity to review the errata before public review. This is 
a short review; we had scheduled five days (originally December 11 - 15).

When you authenticate to https://ditaweb.com/oasis-dita, you should see 
the errata in the Publications pane under "Open Reviews".

If you don't have a DITAWeb account, or need account or other DITAWeb 
assistance, let me know.

-Alan

-- 
Alan Houser
Group Wellesley, Inc.
Consultant and Trainer, Technical Publishing
arh on Twitter
412-450-0532