[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]
Subject: Re: [dita] RE: Issue #29: Bookmap modifications -- Attn reviewers Amber Swope and Robert Anderson
That’s too generic a name for a domain. If it were a base map element, maybe, but as part of a specialization, the name needs to be qualified. <bookmapresources> should default @processing-role to “resource-only” in the grammar files. I think it’s overkill to have three separate resource-wrapper elements (<bookmapresources>, <bookmakers>, and <keydefs>). Why not just add <bookmapresources>
and use it for whatever non-rendering resource definition purposes (specifically keydefs) the author has? Chris From: <dita@lists.oasis-open.org> on behalf of Scott Hudson <scott.hudson@jeppesen.com> What about generalizing the element name: resources ? Thanks and best regards, --Scott From:
<dita@lists.oasis-open.org> on behalf of Éric Sirois <eric.sirois@ixiasoft.com> Hi Amber, The bookmapresources is simply an anchor point to allow other specializations to hook
into that spot. The way the shell is setup you will never see bookmapresources in a drop down menu in an XML editor. It’s there for specializers. The markup below is correct. Bookmapresources is based on topicref
<!-- LONG NAME: Bookmap Specialization Placeholder --> Bookmap.dtd shell: Usually you whould see “bookmapresources |
%bookmapkeydefs-d-bookmapresources;”, but we omitted the first part so it’s not available.
<!ENTITY
% bookmapresources "%bookmapkeydefs-d-bookmapresources; Éric Sirois DITA Toolsmith IXIASOFT 825 Querbes, Suite 200, Montréal, Québec, Canada, H2V 3X1 tel + 1 514 279-4942 / toll free + 1 877 279-4942 mobile + 1 647 462-3620 eric.sirois@ixiasoft.com
/
www.ixiasoft.com
From:
dita@lists.oasis-open.org [mailto:dita@lists.oasis-open.org] On Behalf Of
Amber Swope My apologies for the late response. I have reviewed the proposal and have the following comments/questions:
1.
Does the proposed <bookmapresources> element only allow specializations of <topicref> or also include <topicref> elements?
2.
Is the sample markup correct? Or should <bookmapkeydefs> be replaced with <bookmapresources>? <booktitle> <mainbooktitle>Test</mainbooktitle> </booktitle>
<bookmapkeydefs> <keydef keys="test" href="">
</bookmapkeydefs> <ditavalref href=""> </bookmap>
3.
Also, can we include sample usage of the proposed <bookmakers> element? Thanks, Amber PS – I will be unable to attend tomorrow’s meeting.
From:
Kristen James Eberlein [mailto:kris@eberleinconsulting.com]
Have you reviewed the stage two proposal for #29? Is it ready for TC discussion tomorrow?
Best, On 2/26/2018 12:30 PM, Kristen James Eberlein wrote:
|
[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]