[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]
Subject: RE: Breaking 'Technical Content' specializations into two groups
I like this approach, primarily because it corrals the technology specializations. Is there a more descriptive term for the more general modules? âUtilityâ seems ambiguous. or perhaps thatâs the point. Bill Burns Content Architect | Healthwise bburns@healthwise.org |
www.healthwise.org 208.331.6917 (office) | 208.345.1897 (fax) Healthwise helps people make better health decisions. From: dita@lists.oasis-open.org <dita@lists.oasis-open.org>
On Behalf Of Chris Nitchie *** External email: use caution *** As I mentioned on the call today, Iâm suggesting that we break out the general-purpose modules currently labeled âTechnical Contentâ from the more industry-specific domains also included in that package. Hereâs
how Iâd organize it: General-purpose âutilityâ modules, not particularly bound to any industry, vertical, or classification:
More specific, technology-related specializations:
Chris |
[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]