OASIS Mailing List ArchivesView the OASIS mailing list archive below
or browse/search using MarkMail.

 


Help: OASIS Mailing Lists Help | MarkMail Help

docbook-apps message

[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [Elist Home]


Subject: Re: [Fwd: [Fwd: First Open Source Documentation Summit at the O'ReillyOpen Source Convention]]


Ekbert Mertens a écrit :
> 
> Regarding all those mails saying jadetex is not satisfying: Where is the
> advantage of jadetex against jadertf?

It directly generates DVI (then PS) suitable for books mass printing.

[...]
> In the beginning, I wondered whether we should switch to jadetex (I have no
> experience with tex, yet), but hearing you (and the others) we should not,
> should we?

Depends on your needs and constraints... ;-)

Camille.

> Regards
> Ekbert Mertens
> 
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Camille Bégnis [mailto:camille@mandrakesoft.com]
> > Sent: Mittwoch, 19. Juli 2000 10:42
> > To: docbook-apps
> > Cc: LDP; docbook-tools list
> > Subject: [Fwd: [Fwd: First Open Source Documentation Summit at the
> > O'Reilly Open Source Convention]]
> >
> >
> > Hi all,
> >
> > While reading the article at the end of that message, I wish
> > I had been
> > there.
> > Everyone seems to agree to use DocBook, very well. However, in the
> > opinion of the author himself, the jadetex processing tool is
> > not suited
> > for professional books.
> >
> > I am personally not really happy with jadetex and some others too I
> > know.
> > Do the other people here use it?
> > Are you happy with it?
> > Do you use something else?
> > Did you think in developing something else?
> >
> > I have unhopeful not the sufficient skills in TeX to initiate
> > it myself,
> > but we, at MandrakeSoft, are interested in participating in
> > the project
> > of developing a new solution. A completely rewritten "print"
> > stylesheet,
> > generating true LaTeX seems to be the solution.
> >
> > Camille.
> >
> >
> > -------- Original Message --------
> > From: Dan York <dyork@linuxcare.com>
> > Subject: [Fwd: First Open Source Documentation Summit at the O'Reilly
> > Open Source Convention]
> > Resent-From: ldp-discuss@lists.debian.org
> > To: ldp-discuss <ldp-discuss@lists.debian.org>
> >
> > FYI, this came in from O'Reilly... sounds like an interesting
> > meeting...
> >
> > Regards,
> > Dan
> >
> > -------- Original Message --------
> > Subject: First Open Source Documentation Summit at the O'Reilly Open
> > Source
> > Convention
> > Date: Mon, 17 Jul 2000 15:46:38 -0700 (PDT)
> > From: Carmel Noah <cammie@oreilly.com>
> > To: dan@lpi.org
> >
> > On Sunday, July 16, O'Reilly sponsored an all-day pre-conference
> > meeting on improving the documentation that accompanies open source
> > software. Participants at the Open Documentation Summit included
> > representatives of open source documentation from the Linux
> > Documentation Project, GNOME, KDE, FreeBSD, BSDI, SourceForge, Samba,
> > OASIS, Los Alamos National Labs, Python, and Open Content.
> >
> > O'Reilly Editor-in-Chief Frank Willison reports on what came
> > out of the
> > meeting:
> >
> > http://www.oreilly.com/frank/oscon_summit.html
> >

-- 
Get your head off the keyboard and look behind the screen.


[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [Elist Home]


Powered by eList eXpress LLC