[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [Elist Home]
Subject: Re: [Fwd: [Fwd: First Open Source Documentation Summit at the O'ReillyOpen Source Convention]]
Ekbert Mertens a écrit : > > Regarding all those mails saying jadetex is not satisfying: Where is the > advantage of jadetex against jadertf? It directly generates DVI (then PS) suitable for books mass printing. [...] > In the beginning, I wondered whether we should switch to jadetex (I have no > experience with tex, yet), but hearing you (and the others) we should not, > should we? Depends on your needs and constraints... ;-) Camille. > Regards > Ekbert Mertens > > > -----Original Message----- > > From: Camille Bégnis [mailto:camille@mandrakesoft.com] > > Sent: Mittwoch, 19. Juli 2000 10:42 > > To: docbook-apps > > Cc: LDP; docbook-tools list > > Subject: [Fwd: [Fwd: First Open Source Documentation Summit at the > > O'Reilly Open Source Convention]] > > > > > > Hi all, > > > > While reading the article at the end of that message, I wish > > I had been > > there. > > Everyone seems to agree to use DocBook, very well. However, in the > > opinion of the author himself, the jadetex processing tool is > > not suited > > for professional books. > > > > I am personally not really happy with jadetex and some others too I > > know. > > Do the other people here use it? > > Are you happy with it? > > Do you use something else? > > Did you think in developing something else? > > > > I have unhopeful not the sufficient skills in TeX to initiate > > it myself, > > but we, at MandrakeSoft, are interested in participating in > > the project > > of developing a new solution. A completely rewritten "print" > > stylesheet, > > generating true LaTeX seems to be the solution. > > > > Camille. > > > > > > -------- Original Message -------- > > From: Dan York <dyork@linuxcare.com> > > Subject: [Fwd: First Open Source Documentation Summit at the O'Reilly > > Open Source Convention] > > Resent-From: ldp-discuss@lists.debian.org > > To: ldp-discuss <ldp-discuss@lists.debian.org> > > > > FYI, this came in from O'Reilly... sounds like an interesting > > meeting... > > > > Regards, > > Dan > > > > -------- Original Message -------- > > Subject: First Open Source Documentation Summit at the O'Reilly Open > > Source > > Convention > > Date: Mon, 17 Jul 2000 15:46:38 -0700 (PDT) > > From: Carmel Noah <cammie@oreilly.com> > > To: dan@lpi.org > > > > On Sunday, July 16, O'Reilly sponsored an all-day pre-conference > > meeting on improving the documentation that accompanies open source > > software. Participants at the Open Documentation Summit included > > representatives of open source documentation from the Linux > > Documentation Project, GNOME, KDE, FreeBSD, BSDI, SourceForge, Samba, > > OASIS, Los Alamos National Labs, Python, and Open Content. > > > > O'Reilly Editor-in-Chief Frank Willison reports on what came > > out of the > > meeting: > > > > http://www.oreilly.com/frank/oscon_summit.html > > -- Get your head off the keyboard and look behind the screen.
[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [Elist Home]
Powered by eList eXpress LLC