DOCBOOK-APPS: Re: [Fwd: [Fwd: First Open Source Documentation Summitat the O'Reilly Open Source Convention]]

[Sebastian Rahtz <sebastian.rahtz@computing-services.oxford.ac.uk>]

> > i really cannot see why you want to stick with SGML and DSSSL.
> 
> Both are standards defined by ISO.  A big plus.  I don't mind XML, after
> all it's SGML.
XSL is written in XML :-}

but seriously, who follows ISO standards in this area?

> > why not put the effort into XSL FO?
> 
> It's joung, isn't it?

but growing. unlike DSSSL

>  And XSL code doesn't look appealing -- I like
> Lisp languages much more than baroque inventitions like XSL.  But "de
> gustibus".
i suspect you are in a minority :-}

sebastian