[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [Elist Home]
Subject: Re: DOCBOOK-APPS: abstract red in FO?
Norman Walsh wrote: > > / Eric Richardson <eric@milagrosoft.com> was heard to say: > | The abstract section shows up in red in the PDF from FO. I remember from > | reading this group that the red means something special when the output > | of the process. The XHTML processes this nicely. > > Red means I screwed up. (Literally, it means that no template matched the > element and so the default template got fired. That's not supposed to > happen.) > > I'll take a look. Thanks alot. I'm pretty new to this so it's a little overwelming. I found the default red template today. If I'm not miss reading the DTD, an abstract can be inside articleinfo or just at the top level of the article. Eric :-)
[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [Elist Home]
Powered by eList eXpress LLC