[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [Elist Home]
Subject: Re: DOCBOOK-APPS: Newbie troubles with Docbook/XML + XHTML
Hello John, On Sun, 5 May 2002, John Levon wrote: > On Sat, May 04, 2002 at 11:41:42PM +0200, Steffen Maier wrote: > > > Works a treat, thanks /very/ much. Now the only problem I have > > > left is the xmlns thing, and I suppose a low-tech sed solution > > > will do for that. > > > > What does "the xmlns thing" look like? Is it introducing a wrong namespace > > or even using unsensible xml-syntax like in the following postings? > > No, the syntax is correct (I use xsltproc not saxon). > > I get : > > <hr xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml"/> > > etc. for most elements. I remember the following thread about something similar: http://sources.redhat.com/ml/docbook-apps/2002-q1/msg00155.html > The XHTML validators don't accept xmlns as a valid attribute. IIRC, strictly speaking xmlns is not a real xml attribute but rather a namespace deklaration using attribute syntax. Maybe that's the reason? > Any ideas ? Maybe you use an outdated version of xsltproc. E.g., I have an old version under Windows which shows comparable namespace reduction bugs. > p.s. is there any stylesheets that produce XHTML 1.0+ Strict rather than > Transitional ? Not really (yet). There were some discussions about moving to XHTML strict and Norm realized a bunch of requirements. http://sources.redhat.com/ml/docbook-apps/2001-q4/msg00948.html There was a FIXME inside docbook-xsl-1.49/xhtml of which in 1.50.0 only a FIXME.bak is left. That file mentions some changes with respect to valid XHTML. HTH, Steffen. -- http://w3studi.informatik.uni-stuttgart.de/~maiersn/ mailto:Steffen.Maier@studserv.uni-stuttgart.de
[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [Elist Home]
Powered by eList eXpress LLC