Re: DOCBOOK-APPS: Re: conditionalization of XML

[Dave Pawson <dpawson@nildram.co.uk>]

At 11:33 11/10/2002, Daniel Veillard wrote:

>  I don't affirm or deny anything w.r.t. conditionalization needs. I'm
>just stating my position as the guys who implement and maintain the 
>friggin' code, okay !

Corr, he's a bad tempered old b isn't he :-)



>  I'm not convinced that one need acces to the DocType to conditionalize
>*processing* . 
>  I don't want to add an add-hoc unspecified unstructured processing
>to my toolkit and maintain it.

I think you're right btw Daniel.
  Specials? Bah humbug I think is the atypical reply.

Regards DaveP.