[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [Elist Home]
Subject: Re: DOCBOOK-APPS: Rely on CSS?
Paul Grosso wrote: > At 13:39 2003 01 21 +0100, Stefan Priebsch (>e-novative>) wrote: > <snip/> > I'd say our advantages accrue from the fact that we are using DocBook > XML for our source. The CSS+HTML is the output, not the source. As > output, its raison d'etre is to present well. (Yes, this includes > being accessible, but use of the style attribute doesn't prevent this.) This is all still very general or vague, it seems to me. When we raise the notion of accessibility, for example, what do we mean? In my recollection, the style attribute is flagged as an accessibility no-no by many HTML validation utilities, the better ones, ie. those that generate notes, warnings, etc. about issues other than pure validation. (I haven't sent a DocBook sourced HTML page to one of the online accessibility services; I wonder how it would fare?) For my part, I'd like to think that there was solid support from the DocBook community to aim for WAI Guidelines conformance at some meaningful level "out of the box"; most importantly for the HTML and XHTML transformations, but also wherever else it makes a difference for people with disabilities. Regards. ...edN
[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [Elist Home]
Powered by eList eXpress LLC