Re: PassiveTeX problems

[Steinar Bang <sb@dod.no>]

>>>>> Tim Waugh <twaugh@redhat.com>:

> On Wed, Mar 19, 2003 at 12:49:49PM +0100, Steinar Bang wrote:
>> Which in sum made me decide not to try to tamper with anything. :-)

> If you're using docbook-xsl-1.60.1 you'll need a newer passivetex too.

OK.

> (Alternatively, Red Hat Linux 8.0 ships with a version of docbook-xsl
> that passivetex does work with.)

That one got kicked out by my own 1.60.1 RPM (which I needed for other
things).  Not intentionally, actually.  I guess it provided a feature
with the same name as our RPM.