[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]
Subject: Re: footnotes and their separators
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 / flo@abwesend.de was heard to say: | - numbering of footnotes | | is there a way to number (bop-)footnotes per page instead of using one | series of successing numbers for the hole document? | If those numbers values are available during the transformation process, | this could help me to solve the other problem: Not that I know of. The numbers are not available during transformation because that occurs before pagination. You could reset the numbers at chapter boundaries or something though; they don't have to be consecutive throughout the entire document. | - using proper footnote separators | | How can I customize my stylesheets that a fo:leader occurs above every first | footnote item at the bottom of the page? | I am at a point where the leader is created above every footnote numbered | with "1". That's interesting. Can you provide a sample document where you get one footnote with a leader separator and another without? I think this is probably an FOP bug. | What about that way: include into the fo-file a statement like | "init global variable _last_ , (*)if current page-number not equals _last_ | or _last_ is initial, save current pagenumber as variable _last_ and add the | fo:leader- Separator. at next footnote goto (*)" No mutable variables in functional languages. | what about the flow xsl-footnote-separator? I get a | [ERROR] region-name 'xsl-footnote-separator' doesn't exist in the | layout-master-set. | while formatting with manually inserted | <fo:static-content flow-name="xsl-footnote-separator"><fo:block><fo:leader | leader-pattern="rule" leader-length="100%" rule-thickness="0.5pt" | rule-style="solid" color="black"/></fo:block></fo:static-content> | into the .fo to the right location. If FOP supports xsl-footnote-separator, then the stylesheets need to be tweaked to use it. At the moment, they don't use it if FOP is being used because the last time I tried, FOP didn't understand it. Your error makes me think it still doesn't. That'd be a FOP bug. Be seeing you, norm - -- Norman Walsh <ndw@nwalsh.com> | Those who abandon their dreams http://www.oasis-open.org/docbook/ | will discourage yours. Chair, DocBook Technical Committee | -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.0.6 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Processed by Mailcrypt 3.5.7 <http://mailcrypt.sourceforge.net/> iD8DBQE+jUkMOyltUcwYWjsRApAvAJ91OIwHJAjORsSkGbCzPG8uoLjifQCfeP+G 9Rfs61fSg+UAn1h+z00S1Ak= =fB+T -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]