[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]
Subject: xsl:sytlesheet: use of native html tokens for e.g. emphasis
Hi, I noticed when generating html output that some tokens generated by the xsl sheet already have a defined element in html 4.0 and xhtml 1.0. e.g. <em> for <div clas="emphasis"> http://www.w3.org/TR/1998/REC-html40-19980424/struct/text.html#h-9.2.1 lists the elements EM, STRONG, DFN, CODE, SAMP, KBD, VAR, CITE, ABBR, and ACRONYM and http://www.w3.org/TR/1998/REC-html40-19980424/struct/text.html#h-9.2.2 BLOCKQUOTE and Q The W3C recommends those for using textual representation. To users i think it does not make much difference. (The Browser's I have tested do support those tags, if they support css). But I may have a difference to search engine's and text processor's as those <q> is more conqurete than <div class="quote">. Or <em> for <div class="emphasis">. So why was the <div class="element"> chosen over <element> ? P.S.: Is there a script in the xsl distribution that displays all used css elements in the outputted html document ? Ciao Jens Skripczynski -- E-Mail: skripi-lists(at)myrealbox(dot)com Naturwissenschaftler haben endlich die Frage geklärt, warum Pinguine nicht fliegen können. Die Antwort ist denkbar einfach: "Was nicht fliegt, kann auch nicht abstürzen!"
[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]