Re: Chunked HTML file names too long for ISO9660

[Steinar Bang <sb@dod.no>]

>>>>> Norman Walsh <ndw@nwalsh.com>:

> Ah, no. You could add <?dbhtml filename="foo.html"?> PIs, but that's
> tedious too.

Indeed.  I much prefer using the <section> ids.  Setting them isn't
tedious at all.

> I'm not sure what to say. I'm reluctant to make the stylesheets
> generate warnings for this case, but maybe I can jigger things so you
> can easily add them to your customization layer...

Well, personally I'm aware of the problem, and therefore keep my ids
short, and test the resulting chunked HTML on Win32 before releasing.
But it might bite someone else.

Perhaps something for Dave Pawson's FAQ?  (it seems to be down right
now, so I couldn't check if it already had something there)