Re: [docbook-apps] Multiple processing document with exsl:node-set and xsltproc

[Daniel Veillard <veillard@redhat.com>]

On Mon, Aug 11, 2003 at 10:49:45AM +0200, Patrick Eisenacher wrote:
> Hi Vitaly,
> 
> this sounds like you're experiencing the same problems like I did with 
> profiling. In short, ids get lost when doing profiling with xsltproc. It 
> seems that the specification on how to do this properly is at fault, not 
> xsltproc, though. Currently, you can only do 2-step-profiling with xsltproc.
> 
> Check this thread for more details: 
> http://sources.redhat.com/ml/docbook/2003-07/msg00177.html

  Well do the maintainers expect to fix the stylesheets or feel fine
keeping code based un undefined behaviour ? This sounds insane to 
just copy full subtree of the documents to then look for keys in
a copy of the given set ... Can't profiling be done without copying
to a new subtree ???

Daniel

-- 
Daniel Veillard      | Red Hat Network https://rhn.redhat.com/
veillard@redhat.com  | libxml GNOME XML XSLT toolkit  http://xmlsoft.org/
http://veillard.com/ | Rpmfind RPM search engine http://rpmfind.net/