Re: [docbook-apps] Numbering book parts & appendices broken in xsl 1.69?

[Michael Smith <smith@xml-doc.org>]

I think that fix was for the appendix labeling only. I'm not
certain, but I don't think any change was made yet to revert the
part labeling to roman numerals.

  --Mike

Bob Stayton <bobs@sagehill.net> writes:

> This was noted and fixed in CVS.  The latest snapshot version should work
> correctly:
> 
> http://docbook.sourceforge.net/snapshot/
> 
> Bob Stayton
> Sagehill Enterprises
> DocBook Consulting
> bobs@sagehill.net
> 
> 
> ----- Original Message ----- 
> From: "Gerd v. Egidy" <lists@egidy.de>
> To: <docbook-apps@lists.oasis-open.org>
> Sent: Wednesday, July 27, 2005 7:59 AM
> Subject: [docbook-apps] Numbering book parts & appendices broken in xsl
> 1.69?
> 
> 
> > Hi,
> >
> > I found a strange behavior after upgrading from docbook-xsl 1.68.1 to
> 1.69:
> >
> > I haven't customized anything with the numbering style. With 1.68.1 the
> parts
> > got labeled with roman numbers (I., II., ...) and the appendices with
> letters
> > (A., B.,...).
> >
> > With 1.69 parts and appendices are labeled with numbers (1., 2.,...).
> >
> > I tried to work around that problem with this customisation code:
> >
> > <xsl:template match="part" mode="division.number">
> >   <xsl:number from="book" count="part" format="I."/>
> > </xsl:template>
> >
> > but it didn't help.
> >
> > Is this a bug is 1.69 or a problem on my side?
> >
> > Kind regards,
> >
> > Gerd

-- 
Michael Smith
http://logopoeia.com/  http://www.oreillynet.com/pub/au/890

smime.p7s