[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]
Subject: Re: [docbook] Problem with fop and fop.extension
Oops...need to send to the list. Glen Glen Mazza wrote: > Petr Hracek wrote: > >> Hi all, >> >> during the fop operations I have received following exception >> Exception >> javax.xml.transform.TransformerException: >> org.apache.fop.apps.FOPException: >> file:///home/cz2b10q6/Documents/DocBooks/DenikZaslOtce/DenikZaslOtce.fo:2:24488: >> Error(2/24488): No element mapping definition found for fox:outline >> >> Can you tell me which element I have to mapped? >> >> regards >> Petr >> > > Best to stay with FOP 0.20.5. If you are using fop 0.91, fox:outline > does not exist, as the new version uses the new XSL 1.1 bookmarks > instead. I don't believe there is a port yet in Docbook to the new > version of FOP, also, the fox:destination is still unimplemented in 0.91. > > fox:outline had a very messy content model (basically, you could place > it anywhere), making rigorous XSL input validation very difficult. FOP > 0.91, OTOH, enforces the content model for the XSL 1.1 bookmarks per the > XSL candidate recommendation, allowing for input validation to be much > more solid. > > [Incidentally, if someone could tell me why there is no equivalent to > fox:destination (PDF anchors) in XSL 1.1, I would *love* to know. The > XSL Working Group implemented bookmarks in 1.1--obviating fox:bookmark, > fox:outline--but not fox:destination, causing me to think there is > actually no need for it, and that the commercial FO processors are doing > something else to create PDF anchors.] > > Glen >
[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]