[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]
Subject: Re: [docbook-apps] Docbook toolchain tips
For graphical XML editors, if being free is not a requirement then you should also look at XMetal from Blast Radius, Serna from Syntext, and Arbortext Editor from PTC. For making the case for DocBook, you might want to take a look at the slides for a presentation I made last year on "Single Source Publishing With DocBook XSL". It is available from my website home page: http://www.sagehill.net Feel free to borrow the ideas and bullet points to make your case. If you borrow the slide set, I'd appreciate getting some credit. Bob Stayton Sagehill Enterprises DocBook Consulting bobs@sagehill.net ----- Original Message ----- From: "Luciano Scavizzi" <feanorelf@gmail.com> To: <docbook-apps@lists.oasis-open.org> Sent: Saturday, May 06, 2006 1:17 AM Subject: [docbook-apps] Docbook toolchain tips I am pushing my company to adopt Docbook as a "documentation standard", but, of course, my (questionable) personal charme is not a point good enough to convince my colleagues and our senior management. As speaking of semantics precision and separation of content from format is not that a involving subject, the basic point I am making out is the advantage of single-source documents. On the other hand, I usually write my XML docs with a plain text editor, I do not think many employees of ours are confident with markup languages and would switch happily from MS Word to inputing tagged text in an editor. I wonder if you can suggest some esy-to-use authoring tool (I've already tried Sydoc) for Win32. Furthermore, as a FO formatter, I am realizing FOP, while being more than enough form my personal use, is far from flawless. I have tested XSL Formatter and XEP, and I must say I like very much the former for its speed and its neat output (I also understood it has a very good standard compliance). I have also found on the web many more tools I haven't tested yet, and I could not find any comprehensive fo-support comparison chart, but one at http://www.antennahouse.com/xslfo/comparison-fo.htm. Which of the processors around are worth a try in your opinion? My minimum requirements are good SVG support and a "predictable" behavior (i.e. adhere quite strictly to w3c recommendations). Thanks, Luciano --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: docbook-apps-unsubscribe@lists.oasis-open.org For additional commands, e-mail: docbook-apps-help@lists.oasis-open.org
[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]