[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]
Subject: Problem with resolution of entities
Docbook 5, xsl 1.75.2, Oxygen 11.0 MacOS 10.4.11 Saxon 6.5.5 XEP 4.16 - FO to PDF I find that set theory symbols (∩ etc) resolve correctly in footnotes to text in a <para> and in footnotes to text in a <table><info><title>, but do not resolve in text (<para>) or text in <table><tgroup>(<thead>|<tbody>)<row><entry>. I have tried both entity names (∩ etc) and code points (∩ etc) - both react the same way. Looks like a bug, but any suggestions/help welcome. The files are below, and the PDF output attached as test.pdf *****file test.xml***** <?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" ?> <!DOCTYPE appendix [ <!ENTITY % qwerty SYSTEM "/Library/WebServer/Documents/_XML/_JC_a_DB5/qwerty.ent"> %qwerty; ]> <appendix xmlns="http://docbook.org/ns/docbook" version="5.0" xml:id="Venn" xml:lang="EN"> <info><title>A Simple Set Theory Approach</title></info> <para>try cap: A∩A --- try 2229: A∩A</para> <para>try sup: B⊃B --- try 2283: B⊃B</para> <para>try sub: C⊂C --- try 2282: C⊂C</para> <para>try empty: D∅D --- try 2205: D∅D</para> <para>try ne: E≠E --- try 2260: E≠E</para> <para>try 2260: F…F --- try 2026: F…F</para> <para>try nbsp: G G --- try 0020: G Z</para> <para>para<footnote><para>try cap: A∩A --- try 2229: A∩A</para></footnote></para> <para>para<footnote><para>try sup: B⊃B --- try 2283: B⊃B</para></footnote></para> <para>para<footnote><para>try sub: C⊂C --- try 2282: C⊂C</para></footnote></para> <para>para<footnote><para>try empty: D∅D --- try 2205: D∅D</para></footnote></para> <para>para<footnote><para>try ne: E≠E --- try 2260: E≠E</para></footnote></para> <para>para<footnote><para>try hellip: F…F --- try 2026: F…F</para></footnote></para> <para>para<footnote><para>try nbsp: G G --- try 0020: G Z</para></footnote></para> <table frame="all" xml:id="Pop_anal" colsep="1" rowsep="1"><info><title>The Effect of Constraints upon the Size of the Population Set<footnote><para> … then we have no knowledge of the possible overlap of the two sets, (we have no knowledge of whether B∩A=∅, B⊂A, B=A or B⊃A.) However, if B=A or B⊃A; then we would have to infer ≠ … </para></footnote></title></info> <tgroup align="left" cols="4" colsep="1" rowsep="1"> <colspec colname="cl" colwidth="1*"/> <colspec colname="c2" colwidth="0.7*"/> <colspec colname="c3" colwidth="0.8*"/> <colspec colname="c4" colwidth="1.2*"/> <spanspec align="center" nameend="c4" namest="c1" spanname="hspan"/> <thead> <row> <entry>Independent Requirement ∩</entry> <entry>Fraction of Population⊃</entry> <entry>Population of set⊂</entry> <entry>Intersection Set∅</entry> </row> </thead> <tbody> <row> <entry>(…X… Z   Z ≠X≠ G)</entry> <entry>1 in 10</entry> <entry>0.0024</entry> <entry>(A∩B∩C∩D∩E∩F∩G)</entry> </row> <row> <entry>(… ≠ ∅ ⊂ ⊃ H)</entry> <entry>1 in 10</entry> <entry>0.0002</entry> <entry>(A∩B∩C∩D∩E∩F∩G∩H)</entry> </row> </tbody> </tgroup> </table> </appendix> *****file qwerty.ent***** <!ELEMENT ents (a?)> <!ENTITY sub "⊂"> <!-- is a proper sub-set of (i.e. is not equal to) --> <!ENTITY sup "⊃"> <!-- is a superset of --> <!ENTITY cap "∩"> <!-- intersection of sets --> <!ENTITY empty "∅"> <!-- empty or null set --> <!ENTITY ne "≠"> <!-- not equal to --> <!ENTITY hellip "…"> <!-- horizontal ellipsis --> <!ENTITY nbsp " "> <!-- ascii space --> -- Ron Catterall Ph.D. D.Sc. ron@catterall.net http://catterall.net
S/MIME Cryptographic Signature
[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]