Re: [docbook-apps] XInclude with xpointer and ID

["Dew, Simon" <Simon.Dew@sbdinc.com>]

Hi Cristobal

Instead of <section id="reqs">, try <section xml:id="reqs">
-- 
Simon Dew

Technical Author | Stanley Security Solutions
1 Park Gate Close, Bredbury, Stockport SK6 2SZ, U.K.

Simon.Dew@SBDInc.com | +44 (0) 161 406 3400
www.stanleysecuritysolutions.co.uk

Registered Office: Stanley House, Bramble Road, Swindon
Registered in England and Wales No. 181585 VAT No. 232 2446 95

On 06/02/13 19:41, Cristobal Vio wrote:

> Hi all,
>
> I was trying to make a modular document with XIncludes using xpointer.
> I would like to use them with the ID that tags are assigned. Like so
>
> some doc:
> ...
> <section id="reqs">
>      <title>Requerimentos</title>
> ...
> </section>
> ...
>
> some other doc:
>
> ...
> <xi:include href="../../antica/antica-iwrs-procs-admin/antica_admin.xml"
>                  xpointer="element(reqs)"/>
> ...
>
> But this scheme is not working for me. Not in xsltproc neither in fop.
>
> if I use xpointer="element(/1/6)" , for example, it does work
>
> but that means that i cannot add an element (say a paragraph) before the
> included elements, because that would mean that the numbering changes
>
> what is wrong with my scheme?
>
> i've searched lots of sites but i haven't found a similar problem,
> besides some people that wasn't defining their DTD right
>
> btw, I'm using docbook version 5 and my docbook headers look like this
>
> <?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
> <!DOCTYPE article [
> <!ENTITY % HashEnts SYSTEM "urn:xml-antica:llaves.ent">
> %HashEnts;
> ]>
> <article version="5.0" xml:lang="es" xmlns="http://docbook.org/ns/docbook";
>        xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink";
>        xmlns:xi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XInclude";
>        xmlns:svg="http://www.w3.org/2000/svg";
>        xmlns:m="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML";
>        xmlns:html="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml";
>        xmlns:db="http://docbook.org/ns/docbook";>
>
> where i add a DOCTYPE element because I need to use some entities file
> defined somewhere else
> of course the ones belonging to the included parts are of type section :)
>
> If someone of you could tell me the mistake im committing if any, it
> would be very useful
>
> Thanks a lot!
>
>
>