[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]
Subject: Re: [docbook-publishers] Legal citations (I'll stop after this!)
On 18/02/2008, Hanratty, John (LNG-LON) <john.hanratty@lexisnexis.co.uk> wrote: > Hi Dave, > > Yes, there's a lot of trumpet-blowing on the site, but the idea of a > "neutral cite" is one where the reporter series does not form part of > the cite, i.e. there's no reference to a volume or issue number. These > guys are, I suppose merely substituting their URL for the reportercite, > and I'm not suggesting we incorporate any URLs in our citation model, > but the idea of a neutral cite is useful and widespread. The second > resource I circulated (which the first led me to) is "cleaner". > http://www.aallnet.org/committee/citation/ucg/index.html > > As you can see, there is no reporter/series number, hence "neutral" > cite. Anyone have any idea if this 'format' case name year court designation opinion paragraph is anything like universal/applicable wider than the US? E.g. could I mix up Peterborough City Court(Canada) with Peterborough City Court (UK) and finish up with the same citation reference? This does appear flexible. Just wondered how flexible? regards -- Dave Pawson XSLT XSL-FO FAQ. http://www.dpawson.co.uk
[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]