[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [Elist Home]
Subject: Re: Section doesn't allow SimpleSect?
| Sect1-Sect5 can all terminate with a simplesect. Section cannot. | Did we do that intentionally? Reflecting on this while destroying unwanted plants in the garden, I think yes and no. Maybe. - Simplesect came before section, I think. Am I wrong? - Section's goal was absolute genericity (if not generousity) below the Chapter or Article level - it was not a part of the goal to enable Simplesect So while we probably just forgot about Simplesect, it's not inappropriate that we didn't allow for it. If we'd thought about it, we might well have left it out intentionally. Does someone want Simplesect in Section, or does the question arise from stylesheet exercises (anyone remember Czerny?)? regards, Terry
[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [Elist Home]
Powered by eList eXpress LLC