Re: [docbook-tc] Transclusions to XInclude mapping

[Dave Pawson <dave.pawson@gmail.com>]

On 16 October 2010 23:12, Jirka Kosek <jirka@kosek.cz> wrote:
> Hi folks,
>
> please find attached updated version of transclusion proposal, which now
> contains new appendix C with mapping from transclusions to XInclude.
>
> My first impression is that XInclude and state of its implementations
> are not powerful enough to be used as a replacement for transclusions.
>
>                                Jirka


Thanks Jirka, great piece of work (and good intro to xInclude!).
In summary, do you believe:
a) xInclude isn't up to it
b) Implementation of xInclude isn't up to it?

regards


-- 
Dave Pawson
XSLT XSL-FO FAQ.
Docbook FAQ.
http://www.dpawson.co.uk