Re: [docbook-tc] Version reference for DocBook Publishers documents?

[Dave Pawson <dave.pawson@gmail.com>]

On 1 February 2011 18:24, Scott Hudson <scott.hudson@pelco.com> wrote:

> How shall DocBook Publishers documents be versioned? Should it be similar to
> simplified, such that:
>
> 5.0-extension publishers-1.0

I've always expected the version to be numeric Scott?
Equally, is @version used anywhere such that it would
make it clear that I am processing pubs rather than
plain docbook?


>
> It is not a true subset of DocBook 5.0, due to the additions of Dublin Core,
> speaker, line, linegroup, drama, dialogue, and poetry.


For which TDG is clear. "Don't call it docbook"
Bit late now, but renaming the document element
to x-pubs, where x is book/article/... perhaps?

Or simpler, just give it a clear / different name,
then use docbook ns etc?

First time for docbook I guess.
Is website a fair comparison?

regards


-- 
Dave Pawson
XSLT XSL-FO FAQ.
Docbook FAQ.
http://www.dpawson.co.uk