[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]
Subject: Re: [docbook-tc] Proposed change to scheme versioning
On 25 October 2011 21:27, Jirka Kosek <jirka@kosek.cz> wrote: > On 25.10.2011 18:53, Hudson, Scott wrote: > >> OR should we put the version number at the beginning: >> >> db-5.1-publishers-beta-01 >> db-5.1-assembly-beta-01 >> db-5.1-xinc-beta-01 >> db-5.1-core-beta-01 > > I think that naming schema similar to this would be less confusing and > it will better express that those customizations are on top of DocBook V5.1. +1. It reads very clearly. > > I'm in favor of change in this direction. One question is still > remaining -- what we will put into version attribute? Will we change > pattern for version attribute or we will stick with the current state of > affairs? IMHO that is largely for the machine? Hence db-5.1.01 would/should suffice? HTH -- Dave Pawson XSLT XSL-FO FAQ. Docbook FAQ. http://www.dpawson.co.uk
[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]