[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]
Subject: Re: [docbook-tc] Proposed change to scheme versioning
Dave Pawson <dave.pawson@gmail.com> writes: > On 13 January 2012 20:53, Norman Walsh <ndw@nwalsh.com> wrote: >> Chet Ensign <chet.ensign@oasis-open.org> writes: >>> Indeed there are approved OASIS naming conventions. They are spelled >>> out in the Naming Directives at: >>> >>> http://docs.oasis-open.org/specGuidelines/ndr/namingDirectives-v1.1.html >> >> I thought that applied to the naming of specification documents, not >> ancillary files such as schemas. > > One view is that the output of Oasis Docbook TC is the schema? Sure, but we also produce a specification that points to a number of ancillary files: RELAX NG schemas (compact and XML), XML Schemas, Schematron schemas, etc. I have no problem naming the standards document according to the OASIS rules, but I'm less sanguine about applying those rules to every artifact. Be seeing you, norm -- Norman Walsh <ndw@nwalsh.com> | Man is an intellectual animal, and http://www.oasis-open.org/docbook/ | therefore an everlasting Chair, DocBook Technical Committee | contradiction to himself. His | senses centre in himself, his | ideas reach to the ends of the | universe; so that he is torn to | pieces between the two, without a | possibility of its ever being | otherwise.-- Hazlitt
Attachment:
pgpLB8ZcPJKBo.pgp
Description: PGP signature
[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]