[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]
Subject: Re: [docbook-tc] assembly info proposal
"Bob Stayton" <bobs@sagehill.net> writes: > 2. For content intended to be included in the output, I would suggest > <merge> instead of <override>. Whatever content is in merge is > intended to be merged with the resources to generate the output. > Exactly how it is merged is up the local application. I'm happy with <merge> instead of <override>, but I still have a preference for <info> as the wrapper for metadata about the element in which it appears. That's what it means *everywhere else*. Yes, some authors will get it wrong sometimes. And they won't get the results they expect and they'll fix it. Be seeing you, norm -- Norman Walsh <ndw@nwalsh.com> | What are the thoughts of the http://www.oasis-open.org/docbook/ | canvas on which a masterpiece is Chair, DocBook Technical Committee | being created? "I am being soiled, | brutally treated and concealed | from view." Thus men grumble at | their destiny, however fair.--Jean | Cocteau
Attachment:
pgpKwtwZvI2dF.pgp
Description: PGP signature
[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]