[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]
Subject: Re: First attempt at DocBook V5.1-CSPRD01
Chet Ensign <chet.ensign@oasis-open.org> writes:
> I've been through the files and they look good. Real close to ready-to-publish.
> Here are some tweaks and next steps, mostly minor formatting notes.
>
> 1) First thing, we'll need to have both a Committee Spec Draft copy
> (...-csd01.xxx) *and* the Committee Spec Public Review Draft (...-csprd01.xxx) to
> load. You can bundle them and approve them all in 1 ZIP file and I'll load them
> separately.
Ok. I've put everything in a single zip that I put on Kavi.
> 2) In addition to the HTML document, we need a copy of the editable source and a
> PDF.
Ok.
> 3) The purple for the text headings is different from the one in our template. The
> one in our template is RGB 59,0,111
I think that's in
http://docs.oasis-open.org/templates/DocBook/spec-0.6/css/oasis-spec.css
> 4) I see that in the catalog file, the comment says to send comments to docbook@.
> It should use docbook-comment@lists.oasis-open.org. Only TC members can send to
> docbook@ but anyone can subscribe and send to docbook-comment@
Ok.
> Docbook.html
>
> 1) For the Committee Specification Draft, the stage description under the title
> will be:
>
> Committee Specification Draft 01
Fixed.
> For the public review copy, it will be:
>
> Committee Specification Draft 01 /
> Public Review Draft 01
Ok.
> 2) The approval date will be set to whatever date the TC approves the CSD/CSPRD
> obviously.
Right. I've dated it tomorrow.
> 3) Under Specification URIs we use "This version" instead of both caps "This
> Version"
Fixed.
> 4) Under "This version," you'll also need to include links to the editable source
> and PDF:
>
> http://docs.oasis-open.org/docbook/docbook/v5.1/csd01/docbook-v5.1-csd01.xml
> http://docs.oasis-open.org/docbook/docbook/v5.1/csd01/docbook-v5.1-csd01.pdf
>
> and in the public review copy
>
>
> http://docs.oasis-open.org/docbook/docbook/v5.1/csprd01/docbook-v5.1-csprd01.xml
>
> http://docs.oasis-open.org/docbook/docbook/v5.1/csprd01/docbook-v5.1-csprd01.pdf
>
> The same also is true for the "Latest version" links
>
> 5) For the link under Technical Committee, please use
> https://www.oasis-open.org/committees/docbook/. The link that's there now doesn't
> take the reader to the TC's public page.
Ok.
> 6) Additional artifacts looks good. Related Work should be lowercase 'w'.
> Namespace should be lowercase n.
Ok.
> 7) Under Status, at the end of the last paragraph, we now include a sentence that
> reads:
>
> "Any other numbered Versions and other technical work produced by the Technical
> Committee (TC) are listed at
> https://www.oasis-open.org/committees/tc_home.php?wg_abbrev=docbook#technical."
Ok.
> In the second paragraph, I'd link "Send a Comment" to
> https://www.oasis-open.org/committees/comments/index.php?wg_abbrev=docbook
Ok.
> I'm not sure about including the sentence about the 'non-normative' errata. Errata
> are supposed to be approved and published along with the standards they correct. I
> think I'd prefer it if you remove the sentence.
Ok.
> 8) Here is what to use for the citation format - for the Committee Spec Draft
>
> [DocBook-5.1]
> <ital>DocBook Version 5.1</>. Edited by Norman Walsh. 18 November 2014. OASIS
> Committee Specification Draft 01.
> http://docs.oasis-open.org/docbook/docbook/v5.1/csd01/docbook-v5.1-csd01.html.
> Latest version: http://docs.oasis-open.org/docbook/docbook/v5.1/docbook-v5.1.html
> .
>
> and for the public review draft
>
> [DocBook-5.1]
> <ital>DocBook Version 5.1</>. Edited by Norman Walsh. 18 November 2014. OASIS
> Committee Specification Draft 01 / Public Review Draft 01.
> http://docs.oasis-open.org/docbook/docbook/v5.1/csprd01/docbook-v5.1-csprd01.html.
> Latest version: http://docs.oasis-open.org/docbook/docbook/v5.1/docbook-v5.1.html
> .
Ok.
> 9) In section 4. Conformance, the second paragraph refers to "reference
> documentation" that describes additional constraints. Where is that document? Is
> it something separate from this publication?
Yes, that's http://docbook.org/tdg51/en/html/docbook.html
I don't think it's practical to publish that document as part of the
specification, it's simply too large. However, if you want to mirror it
on docs.oasis-open.org, that's probably doable.
> 10) In the Introduction, there is a sentence that reads: "The current list of
> outstanding requests is available through the SourceForge tracker interface. This
> is also the preferred mechanism for submitting new requests." -- I realize that
> the SourceForge project has been there for a long time however technically it
> violates TC Process to accept comments from any other source than
> docbook-comment@lists.oasis-open.org. I'd be more comfortable if you would remove
> the "This is also the preferred..." sentence or replace it with one pointing
> people to docbook-comment@. Copying comments from that list to the tracker is not
> a problem but soliciting comments there is.
I'm not sure I understand how the process expects to control how
members of the technical committee receive suggestions. If someone
writes one on the back of a chewing gum wrapper and hands it to a
member of the committee in the subway, I don't see how the committee
member can be forbidden from mentioning it at the next meeting.
However, I've updated that paragraph.
> As far as the next steps go, they'd be these:
>
> - Once the revised files are ready to go, package them all into a ZIP file and
> load it to the Kavi site.
I believe they are here.
https://www.oasis-open.org/apps/org/workgroup/docbook/download.php/54757/docbook-drafts-2014-12-16.zip
If you want to take another look, that would be great. I'll get the
minutes to record the appropriate things tomorrow.
Be seeing you,
norm
--
Norman Walsh <ndw@nwalsh.com> | So, are you working on finding that bug
http://nwalsh.com/ | now, or are you leaving it until later?
| Yes.
[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]