[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]
Subject: DocBook repository confusion
Hi all, Iâve been working on a major cleanup of the âdefguideâ repo. That caused me to look more closely at the âdocbookâ repo and Iâm confused. Some of the changes in 5.2 (e.g., buildtarget) are already checked into master. Some are only in the docbook-5.2-dev branch. (We also had some improvements that had been merged into master but not 5.2; that may have been my fault, Iâve rebased them back into the 5.2 branch.) Jirka, did you have a particular plan there? On another front, the publishers 1.1 schema appears to have been checked into the 5.1 branch, but not master. So the version in the 5.2 branch is 1.0 not 1.1. Iâm in the process of bringing the publishers version in the 5.2-dev branch up to 1.1+. I propose that we merge docbook-5.2-dev back into master since weâve already got some 5.2 changes in there. I propose also that we publish a 1.2b of Publishers thatâs based off of 5.2 DocBook schema. Mostly this involves marking new elements as ânot allowedâ (buildtarget, legalsection, etc.) Does the TC have a sense of whether or not âformalgroupâ should be in Publishers? Be seeing you, norm -- Norman Walsh <ndw@nwalsh.com> | What is written without effort is in http://nwalsh.com/ | general read without pleasure.--Samuel | Johnson
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [List Home]