[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [Elist Home]
Subject: DOCBOOK: Re: new problems with xt and passivetex...
"Sebastian Rahtz" <sebastian.rahtz@computing-services.oxford.ac.uk> writes: > Arrigo Benedetti writes: > > I'm trying to typeset the following XML document (test.xml), compliant > > with the Simplified DocBook XML V4.0.1, by using the latest DocBook XSL > > stylesheets: > > The Docbook XSL stylesheets us an old version of the XSL FO spec; > PassiveTeX implements (partially) the current draft, so don't expect > it to work in this situation. > Thanks much for the information Sebastian. > you can cut out all this verbosity by uncommenting > \xmltraceoff in xmltex.cfg > > > Any ideas? Should I try jadetex instead? > > depends what you are trying to achieve... > > sebastian I'm simply trying to find and set up the right combination of tools that will allow me to generate a decent looking pdf file from an XML document compliant with the Simplified DocBook DTD containg some figures in eps format. If I could generate HTML from the same document I would be even happier, even though this is not a strict requirement at this time. Best, -Arrigo -- Dr. Arrigo Benedetti e-mail: arrigo@vision.caltech.edu Caltech, MS 136-93 phone: (626) 395-3695 Pasadena, CA 91125 fax: (626) 795-8649
[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [Elist Home]
Powered by eList eXpress LLC