Re: see also representation (was Re: DOCBOOK: "How do I represent...?")

[Norman Walsh <ndw@nwalsh.com>]

/ Adam Di Carlo <adam@onshore.com> was heard to say:
| "John R. Daily" <jdaily@progeny.com> writes:
| 
| > * I would like to formalize the "See also" concept. I don't think a
| > bibliography is what I'm aiming for, although if that should be used,
| > that's fine. I intend to provide a unique document identifier to each
| > document, and I would like to be able to provide a list of such
| > identifiers in the meta-information for each document, perhaps with a
| > relationship value to indicate the relevance of the other document.

If you want to do cross-document links at the source level, OLink is your
only hope. And it sounds like it might suit what you have in mind.

| I'm hitting this problem right now since I'm using DocBook (SGML)
| for online help.

DocBook as a source for online help comes up fairly regularly.

| Does anyone have any "best practices" or experiences to share about
| this?  I'm thinking I need a little element kinda like NOTE or
| whatever that carries this stuff.  Shouldn't be too hard to hack up
| the SGML modular extension and DSSSL stuff for it, but I don't wanna
| do more than I have to...

Can you provide some examples?

                                        Be seeing you,
                                          norm

-- 
Norman Walsh <ndw@nwalsh.com>      | 'I have done that,' says my
http://www.oasis-open.org/docbook/ | memory. 'I cannot have done
Chair, DocBook Technical Committee | that'--says my pride, and remains
                                   | adamant. At last--memory
                                   | yields.--Nietzsche