[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [Elist Home]
Subject: RE: DOCBOOK: Open Source SGML vs XML.
This one does use Java, but does the job. http://xae.sunsite.dk. Jeff -----Original Message----- From: Kevin Conder [mailto:kconder@interaccess.com] Sent: Monday, March 26, 2001 4:42 PM To: Jirka Kosek Cc: docbook@lists.oasis-open.org Subject: Re: DOCBOOK: Open Source SGML vs XML. On Mon, 26 Mar 2001, Jirka Kosek wrote: > > Would not be better to package XML version of DocBook to Linux > distributions as there are many new tools which are not able to process > SGML? I think that only reason to stay up with SGML for some OSS > projects are included and ignored sections. What about the DSSSL style-sheets that I've spent time customizing? Do I have to start all over? Is there an Open Source XML tool-chain that matches the speed and stability of the default Debian SGML tool-chain? From the daily bug reports on this list, I gather that there is not. What are the Open Source programs one would use to process the XML/DocBook documents? What licenses do they use? Do they match the Debian Free Guidelines? (Also, I'm curious which ones don't use Java.) Has the on-line documentation (The Definitive Guide, FAQs at docbook.org, etc.) been updated to reflect the 4.1 DTD with an XML tool-chain? It doesn't look like it has been. -=- Kevin Conder, http://KevinDumpsCore.com ------------------------------------------------------------------ To unsubscribe from this elist send a message with the single word "unsubscribe" in the body to: docbook-request@lists.oasis-open.org
[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [Elist Home]
Powered by eList eXpress LLC