[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [Elist Home]
Subject: Re: New to DocBook: XML or SGML, Clark or Open?
"Prikryl,Petr" wrote: > - Should I be oriented towards SGML or XML when starting > with DocBook as a total greenhorn? Do I need a unicode > capable editor for XML? I would recomend you XML version. You do not need unicode editor. From your domain, I suppouse that you want write docs in Czech language. In this case, you can start DocBook XML document with line <?xml version="1.0" encoding="windows-1250"?> or <?xml version="1.0" encoding="iso-8859-2"?> and then use appropriate single-byte encoding. > - Should I choose Clark's SP and Jade or OpenSP > and OpenJade? Jade works correctly for me. > - Notice: I am using Windows NT (I have no choice). Read tutorial A brief tutorial how to set up a free SGML editing and publishing system for Windows NT from Markus Hoenicka: http://ourworld.compuserve.com/homepages/hoenicka_markus/ntsgml.html > Question on JadeTeX > ================ > > I am thinking about using (La)TeX for generating printable > version of the documentation and also the PostScript > and PDF versions. Is the TeX back-end the usual way > for doing that? It is usual way, but not only. JadeTeX have some serious problems on longer documents. Another way to produce printed version is to use XSL stylesheets and some FO processor (e.g. PassiveTeX). This tool-chain is improving very rapidly. For larger documents I personally generate RTF file by Jade and then use Word and Distiller to get PDF. ----------------------------------------------------------------- Jirka Kosek e-mail: jirka@kosek.cz http://www.kosek.cz
[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [Elist Home]
Powered by eList eXpress LLC