[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [Elist Home]
Subject: Re: DOCBOOK: how about an inline version of <note>
Marc> Yes, organize your text to fit in a "note" as block element Marc> ;-) Marc> I would have thought that drawing a reader's attention to Marc> inline parts is done using "emphasis". Either that or use Marc> "phrase" with "role='note'" or something. I really don't Marc> think we want inline admonitions. do we (rat-tail of Marc> "important", "warning" etc....)? I guess I could use <emphasis> or <phrase> with a role, but I'm not sure if I agree to your point: docbook already has massive element proliferation, for example for the various types of lists (simplelist, variablelist, orderedlist, itemizedlist), and I kind of like it that way. I am so used to it that I feel more comfortable when I use the one that more closely matches the semantics I am thinking of. I have this conditioned reflex that if I use a locution more than once (like "please note that"), then there should be markup for it. Keep your pencil sharp for when I also ask people if they are interested in inline lists.
[Date Prev] | [Thread Prev] | [Thread Next] | [Date Next] -- [Date Index] | [Thread Index] | [Elist Home]
Powered by eList eXpress LLC